The Poetry & Writings of the Hierophant

[Lord_hierophantūs]

Human nature is evil and is a matter of deliberate effort to become good. If man were good he would not need teachers, if man were all just he would not inflict pain upon others for his own pleasures. Evil men come into power because most people are cowards, when they lack resources they blame their fellow man for all his problems, never taking into account that his behavior effects others including himself. Rather then do what is correct he engages in conniving behavior to achieve his ends, he uses others as a means to an end as if they were not human. A sorcerer uses truth to abuse it and hence uses it to control and dominate others. What do the Tyrants of herr Hitler, Stalin, and Satan, and and devils have in common? They all believe in the same doctrine it is simple a matter of material and choice as to what they are achieving, but the ends are always the same, they use others just as they themselves are being used, they abuse others as they themselves are abused, they uphold that might makes right, that morality is relative to the individual, that man is either a lowly beast or is meant for something higher, but always towards their own benefit that they may prosper account of other peoples suffering. They all uphold that the natural law is fang and claw; everything to the victors and none for those who do not strive as they do, they have a will to move, but they are like the tail of a snake, they cannot see and yet profess to be wise, they cannot know anymore then a beast and yet their will is stronger then the peoples. Therefore, the rules takes sides of these matter:

what is a danger to the people he gets rid of.
what is of danger to the state he destroys.
what takes to grow, he plucks out.
The leader is a farmer,
he is a father,

Nothing is left to chance,
when gambling in principle
he does what is in his favor
and never the cards in the and of his enemy.
​

Lucifer won his own kingdom and having rebelled against natural law made hell, because everything is in contradiction.
Hitler created the third Reich and invited chaos into the world.
Stalin lead the soviet union and created hell on earth.


The ruler knows the law and abides thereby,
The ruler know what truth is and adheres to it.
When rulers make laws contrary to reality they are doomed to die,
when rulers make laws contrary to reality they create suffering,
When rulers do these things they create hell and people suffer.
Hence the ruler knows the rules and guides the people,
he understands reality and is hence truly a sovereign
not by blood, but by works.

 

[AshenMan]

Hierophant ARG

 

[Lord_hierophantūs]

I gave up my books,
I gave up my room,
Nothing, but the clothes on my back.

Family is all I had,
most came and pasted;
here now they are for me.

They love me, but are broken.
I love them, but I to am broken.

I walk as if alive,
inside I am dead,
running from reality
I am the dead.

I cry for the books I lost,
I cry for the mom I left,
I cry for the dog I left behind
and the two I buried.

Cry till it makes rivers,
deep sorrow fills me to the core,
a risk I must take once more.​

 

[Lord_hierophantūs]

Of truth
All men seek after truth.
what is truth?
it changeth not.

it was in the beginning,
it was in the moment,
it was the in the future.

It never changed.
it can be demonstrated,
it can be reasoned to,
the source is always the same.


Of source of things
When wanting to be good, we look first at act,
When wanting to know the source, we look at thought.
In health we look for the cause,
in the result we see the effect.

In being a father, align with right action,
In being a mother, align with right thought.

Fact is that which is,
what isn't is that which once was.
What it is not,
is not.
Why?

Because it did not occur.



Of insanity & contradiction
When left is right, things do not act accordingly,
when good is evil, inner turmoil sets in.
man made law is like synthetic oil
it is not natural to the realm,
its being is fraudulent.

When behavior is brutish, everyone and everything suffers.
Thoughts are the feminine birthing,
Emotions are the child feeling,
Actions are the masculine willing.
So you think,
So you feel,
So you do.

When beings are abused hatred and malice is born,
When one is thrown out, one wonders why?
When they see what they do not have;
does a child not take warmth in a burning village.

The spirit is ignorant of this realm,
hence it needs a teacher,
Even evil has a comprehensive doctrine.

Fill the spirit with discipline and right thought,
and they will bless the world.
Fill the spirit with evil,
and suffering will be common place.

Insane thoughts come from absurdities,
these emotions are know; though not headed,
in actions it devastates everyone.

Therefore, evil is synthetic.
Therefore, good is natural.​

 

[Lord_hierophantūs]

Many of you are aware that manners and etiquette often can be stuffy or out right suffocating in terms of everyone abiding by it and taking offence when it is not reciprocated. However even amongst villain's they themselves have a structure or code of conduct to abide by. As Michael Sugrue puts it from his lecture regarding "Machiavelli":

"the kind of man who self-consciously seeks only the gratification of his desire for political power a man who turns ruthlessness and treachery into matters of principle and that's what makes him so good at them it's not that he's treacherous or lying or faithless or ruthless once in a while he's that way all the time he's turned it into a system."

How then shall we act when many people of the modern day have a disdain for structure, ritual or anything which makes the command that "You must do this and you must do it like that"? While that can happen, tradition is a mode of setting a standard, it makes clear how things ought to be, if we have a method most will abide by it, If most have a way of acting they will keep to it, there comes a time however when we must evolve and the internet is no exception and neither is ignoring reality as it is.

We must find that balance between commonly accepted and natural modes of behavior and keeping to it in a manner that does not make a demand of expulsion to those you do not adhere or perhaps simply wish to not participate. To be kind is a principle, how we direct our kindness is an art. Therefore, we must never give our kindness in excess, but to strategically and gracefully give from sincere love liken to that of an ocean.

A drop of water is weak on its own,
but a flood takes everything along with it.
A drop of blood is weak on its own,
but an entire body has life because of it.​

Altruism, Benevolence, Reciprocity and Trust are the four-fold path that when put into action are the half way to a happy, healthy, wealthy and wise life. The next best is Privacy, we should never invade the privacy of another nor share that information, whatever is said to you from one, should not be told of another it should stay with the person who it was said by and kept by the person whom it was told. If companies of our time are hated for their breach of privacy why then should we disperse of the information of others, only when context demands that a person doing wrong hides in secret should only be revealed when its demanded by context. Words should have meaning according to the expression which is in accordance with reality, words should mean exactly what it is conveying.

If the law of the jungle is upheld,
trust is lost and might prevails inviting mass slaughter.
Distrust creates a need for defense thus weapons prevails over words.
When A people negotiate first, leaving weapons as a means of defense second
it shows that they can be reasoned with and that weapons are used
appropriately.​

Trustworthiness
is a cardinal virtue, not because it gives one power alone, but because it creates harmony, what creates harmony brings peace, because the behavior does no harm, the mind that acts upon it is sincere and intelligent and knows the outcome. Man is half beast and half divine, if he exercises what is carnal he shall see himself like the beast, but when he acts divine he see's himself as one of the Gods. He that takes care to think will benefit himself, he that doeth it not will see only
destruction.


How do we exercise such words?

altruism (n.)​

1853, "unselfishness, devotion to the welfare of others, the opposite of egoism," from French altruisme, coined or popularized 1830 by French philosopher Auguste Comte, with -ism + autrui (Old French altrui) "of or to others," from Latin alteri, dative of alter "other" (see alter). The -l- in the French coinage perhaps is an etymological reinsertion from the Latin word.
benevolent (adj.)
mid-15c., "wishing to do good, well-disposed, kindly," from Old French benivolent and directly from Latin benevolentem (nominative benevolens) "wishing (someone) well, benevolent," related to benevolentia "good feeling," from bene "well" (see bene-) + volentem (nominative volens) present participle of velle "to wish" (see will (v.)). Related: Benevolently.

reciprocity (n.)​

"state or condition of free interchange, mutual responsiveness," 1766, from French réciprocité (18c.), from reciproque, from Latin reciprocus, past participle of reciprocare "rise and fall, move back and forth; reverse the motion of" (see reciprocal). Specifically as "equality of commercial privileges between the subjects of different governments" is by 1782.

trust (n.)​

c. 1200, "reliance on the veracity, integrity, or other virtues of someone or something; religious faith," from Old Norse traust "help, confidence, protection, support," from Proto-Germanic abstract noun *traustam (source also of Old Frisian trast, Dutch troost "comfort, consolation," Old High German trost "trust, fidelity," German Trost "comfort, consolation," Gothic trausti "agreement, alliance").

privacy (n.)​

1590s, "a private or personal matter, a secret;" c. 1600 as "seclusion, state of being in retirement from company or the knowledge and observation of others," from private (adj.) + abstract noun suffix -cy. Meaning "state of freedom from intrusion or interference" is from 1814. Earlier was privatie (late 14c. as "secret, mystery;" c. 1400 as "a secret, secret deed; solitude, privacy"), from Old French privauté.

We exercise Trust by proving first to ourselves that we are worthy of it, then to act upon this worth by showing we are reliable, intelligent, stable and that are intentions are seeable. We exercise Benevolence by acting to do good onto others. We exercise Reciprocity when one gives unto you, give back unto them and what they do for you in kindness do the same to them in turn. We exercise altruism when we put ourselves aside for the needs of others, not for the wants of other.

Therefore:
when one gives unto you, give back unto them and what they do for you in kindness do the same to them in turn, this is reciprocity.
When you act prove you are reliable, intelligent and can be understood, this is trust.
When you act do good to others and with a sincere heart, this is benevolence.
When you put others before yourself to put others needs before your own, this is altruism.

Thus it has been said and so it shall be done.
​

 

[Lord_hierophantūs]

How we text one another matters in so far as what we are communicating is clear and precise, but most of all done with a sincere heart, when one loves another and the feeling mutual, the emotion is intense and one cannot help but want to do it. We love those we love and hate those we hate.

Love is not singular, but plural.
I cannot help but do what they ask me, because they care for me.
My friend I love, because he talks to me and treats me kindly.
I love my dearest, because she looks after me, even when I do not ask.

The greatest kind of loyalty is based on love and not fear,
even evil men understand this and yet fear is they're form of bastard love.
those that love are willing to perish, those that hate are willing to watch them die.

Therefore how should we ourselves love?
When texting we are honest in intention,
Caring when engaging,
Loving with a whole heart.

What if my heart is blackened?
Even you know that you want love,
Even you desire to be understood,
Even you want to be held,
but you run away and hide.
Thus, take the risk of being loved and wisely giving it.​

 

[Tedposter]

I put a lot of emotions when I call some a "faggot" in text

 

[Lord_hierophantūs]

Every human groups must socialize in some form, it has its own ways of communication. If a social circle be principled by fear, then those within that circle will either leave or stay. If a social circle be principled by trust, then those in that group will find common ground and evolution of thought & behavior manifest. Even forums have such culture. What I focus on this moment is social harmony, here on this forum a tradition and culture is set, now it is clear that the topic is for neets and those who do not adhere to societal standards and or tradition that is held in common.

My point is this, how do we find the middle ground between the cultural influences here? I have a few questions to ask:

1.Do you feel safe emotionally here?
2.Do you feel safe to post personal information here?
3.Do you feel that the userbase in majority are trustworthy?
4.Do you feel fear to post about certain topics?

A group must have core principles if it is to survive:
Trust V Fear
Reason V Ignorance
Respect V Disrespect
Kindness V Mean
Care V Apathy
Now I ask you the user, how do you feel about the environment here and about other users? I admit when users here mention me they refer to me as weird or interesting, how do you think others perceive you, what have other people said about you, do you think its true?


The biggest question that I can ask you is this:
How cooperative are you?
How likely are you to like someone socially?
How likely are you to cooperate?
Are you worthy of trust?
Do you think others are worthy of your trust?

 

[Khastle]

I put a lot of emotions when I call some a "faggot" in text

You put a lot of emotion in for meeeee? O//////O
Oh Tedposter I'm so flattered...

 

[Tedposter]

You put a lot of emotion in for meeeee? O//////O
Oh Tedposter I'm so flattered...
View attachment 4146

No, I put a lof of emotions on my text. Cant you read?

 

[bandolerofuzz]

1.Do you feel safe emotionally here?
2.Do you feel safe to post personal information here?
3.Do you feel that the userbase in majority are trustworthy?
4.Do you feel fear to post about certain topics?

1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Dwayne might be a fed
4. I think so

How cooperative are you?
How likely are you to like someone socially?
How likely are you to cooperate?
Are you worthy of trust?
Do you think others are worthy of your trust?

To all above: 50/50, I dunno

I just really don't have a reason to not post here. I would still be stuck in my man cave anyway.

 

[Khastle]

No, I put a lof of emotions on my text. Cant you read?

Showing a lot of emotion here, buddy. Practically oozing with it UwU

 

[nagolpeso]

Every human groups must socialize in some form, it has its own ways of communication. If a social circle be principled by fear, then those within that circle will either leave or stay. If a social circle be principled by trust, then those in that group will find common ground and evolution of thought & behavior manifest. Even forums have such culture. What I focus on this moment is social harmony, here on this forum a tradition and culture is set, now it is clear that the topic is for neets and those who do not adhere to societal standards and or tradition that is held in common.

My point is this, how do we find the middle ground between the cultural influences here? I have a few questions to ask:

1.Do you feel safe emotionally here?
2.Do you feel safe to post personal information here?
3.Do you feel that the userbase in majority are trustworthy?
4.Do you feel fear to post about certain topics?

A group must have core principles if it is to survive:
Trust V Fear
Reason V Ignorance
Respect V Disrespect
Kindness V Mean
Care V Apathy
Now I ask you the user, how do you feel about the environment here and about other users? I admit when users here mention me they refer to me as weird or interesting, how do you think others perceive you, what have other people said about you, do you think its true?


The biggest question that I can ask you is this:
How cooperative are you?
How likely are you to like someone socially?
How likely are you to cooperate?
Are you worthy of trust?
Do you think others are worthy of your trust?

"Society breeds convention. Individualism breeds invention. - Anthony T Hincks"

"Individualism turns a band into a community. Collectivism turns society into a mob. - Jakub Bozydar Wisniewski"

"Perhaps, if one wishes to remain an individual in the midst of the teeming multitudes, one must make oneself grotesque. - Salman Rushdie"

01000011 01101111 01101101 01101101 01110101 01101110 01101001 01100011 01100001 01110100 01100101 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01100001 01110110 01101111 01101001 01100100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110010 01101101 01101001 01100101 01110011 00101110​

 

[nagolpeso]

And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. - John 8:32

If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed. - John 8:36

Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 Corinthians 3:17

Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. - Romans 8:21

 

[Dwayne]

3. Dwayne might be a fed

.. / ... . . / -.-- --- ..-

 

[Dwayne]

3. Dwayne might be a fed

Only kidding!!! UwU

 

[bandolerofuzz]

Only kidding!!! UwU

 

[Trifone Favalercia]

no

 

[ThirdyAughtSix]

Every human groups must socialize in some form, it has its own ways of communication. If a social circle be principled by fear, then those within that circle will either leave or stay. If a social circle be principled by trust, then those in that group will find common ground and evolution of thought & behavior manifest. Even forums have such culture. What I focus on this moment is social harmony, here on this forum a tradition and culture is set, now it is clear that the topic is for neets and those who do not adhere to societal standards and or tradition that is held in common.

My point is this, how do we find the middle ground between the cultural influences here? I have a few questions to ask:

1.Do you feel safe emotionally here?
2.Do you feel safe to post personal information here?
3.Do you feel that the userbase in majority are trustworthy?
4.Do you feel fear to post about certain topics?

A group must have core principles if it is to survive:
Trust V Fear
Reason V Ignorance
Respect V Disrespect
Kindness V Mean
Care V Apathy
Now I ask you the user, how do you feel about the environment here and about other users? I admit when users here mention me they refer to me as weird or interesting, how do you think others perceive you, what have other people said about you, do you think its true?


The biggest question that I can ask you is this:
How cooperative are you?
How likely are you to like someone socially?
How likely are you to cooperate?
Are you worthy of trust?
Do you think others are worthy of your trust?

1 yeah
2 not really but thats not my thing anyway
3 yeah
4 to a degree yes but actually not really

1 depends
2 I usually hate them or like them on sight
3 pretty likely
4 no clue
5 i think so

 

[cultofgettingoutofcults]

i'm not sure if i can sum up all my understanding in a couple of lines here in a way that what i'm communicating is heard the way i intend. also i've never learned how to use forums. but here's my attempt at both:

the question "can man be free" needs to address the understanding of freedom first. there are two initial directions to bring the definition- one, the word "freedom" is without restriction, and the other freedom is within restriction. can there be freedom without restriction? man needs air, man needs food, man gets tired, man gets hurt. that means freedom has restrictions. so does that mean man can never be free? i would say that there is no freedom from everything, so the meaning of freedom shouldn't come with it the impossibilities- that sets everyone up for failure. what is an electron free from a proton? something that doesn't grow into something stronger like iron or even hydrogen. without the systems in the universe we were born from, we wouldn't be, so there would be no 'free'. so the systems in the universe have somewhere in it the potential for freedom. it's the restriction of time/space, mass/gravity that led to us being here now talking about freedom. the movement from simple to complex led to the first, as we know it, creatures with the ability to make decisions and talk about them with verbal language.

we'll never be free from time, at the very least we can never take back that at one point we were beholden to time. time gives us opportunity, so freedom, to be a meaningful word that expresses what we all feel (and we all know we feel a need for freedom because it's a sold and stolen commodity), must reflect something attainable. unless we were all put here to suffer. we weren't. that's known because men cause the suffering of other men; to know for absolute fact we were put here to suffer, we would have to isolate the thing outside of man that causes suffering and then give numeric value to what's left over, whether it causes pain or pleasure.

following this system, there is a very attainable freedom that stupid, lazy, and evil in man is preventing. it takes a lot of words to convey and a lot of changes in perspectives to understand those words. there is a system of self control that is best for the self and everyone else and the path to that self control reveals true freedom. it fits like a glove and collects all the power of the individual that's dispersed throughout the systems that control him to complete the cycle from conqueror of the world to conqueror of the self. there's so much that can't be known/remembered about the self until the individual takes back control of self. and there freedom can be seen for its shape, not the shape we give it.

there's a clear cut path away from politics, culture, religion. those three things are so stupid, fake and gay that it forces retardation and inevitably submission. i hope i added to the conversation