Casual Porn - Drawing a line

[Bibr]

I want to use an old meme to talk about drawing a line on what do you consider porn / coomer content


Idea for this came about when I was on my "porn-free streak" earlier this year. While I was successful in avoiding porn in the form of videos and images, I started to think about whether written stuff could be considered "coomer content". I'm talking about roleplaying and written erotica.
Once that thought came up, the floodgates were open.
How about ASMR?
How about softcore photo sessions?

Should I text her?

And so on and so on. I'm curious to hear your opinions. Where do you draw the line on what is coomer material and what isn't?

 

[Khastle]

Honestly my view is as long as the content wasn't made to invoke lust and encourage its viewers to masturbate then its not porn. I know sometimes it's unintentional but general rule is the intent behind the content foremost.

Also I see very little wrong if said content you're consuming is of your girlfriend or wife (normal pictures to nudes). In the end that's the girl you love and, if you haven't yet, hopefully will one day marry, you want to train your brain to be utmost attracted to her so you think less of other women and focus mostly on pleasing her.

Ultimately, if you really need to nut then imagination is always safest to prevent any porno brain bugs getting into your head.

 

[MemoryHead 記念頭部]

i (obviously) think there is a fine line between art and pron

i have gotten a lot of flak/criticism because some of my album artwork features some nudity. but i never viewed these as porno-graphic. i always try to lean more into a playful/cheeky/artistic maybe SUGGESTIVE or SEXY, but i dont intend it to be a beat-session lol. most of the time im leaning toward something exhibiting aesthetic beauty. god designed women very well.

when i do lean more "Sexy" i intend it to be kind of a silly sort of sexy.

you can beat off to anything, and i suppose someone might beat to an album cover I guess? but its the internet, i could have a dog on an album cover and someone could beat off to that too lol

 

[Khastle]

i (obviously) think there is a fine line between art and pron

i have gotten a lot of flak/criticism because some of my album artwork features some nudity. but i never viewed these as porno-graphic. i always try to lean more into a playful/cheeky/artistic maybe SUGGESTIVE or SEXY, but i dont intend it to be a beat-session lol. most of the time im leaning toward something exhibiting aesthetic beauty. god designed women very well.

when i do lean more "Sexy" i intend it to be kind of a silly sort of sexy.

you can beat off to anything, and i suppose someone might beat to an album cover I guess? but its the internet, i could have a dog on an album cover and someone could beat off to that too lol

In the end bro not our fault God made women so sexy. I agree with you 100% in terms of beautiful women being used for aesthetics, nothing pornographic about it if its used in an artistic manner